Here it is, the last podcast episode for 2011. This time I’m looking at “the “evil god challenge” as posed by Stephen Law in a fairly recent article by that name. Isn’t the evidence for a good God really no better or worse than the evidence that an evil god? In short, no. Here I explain why I think (as I suspect many may think) that the evil god challenges has major philosophical shortcomings, in spite of being an argument worthy of our attention.
- Glenn Peoples and Stephen Law to Discuss the “Evil God” challenge on Unbelievable Radio
- Does the moral argument point to a benevolent God?
- Tom Wright on reading the Bible literally
- Episode 042: The Minimal Facts Approach to the Resurrection
- Internet Sceptic Meets Real World: Reginald Finley and Bart Ehrman
- Consciousness Cuts Both Ways