Right Reason

The blog of Dr Glenn Andrew Peoples on Theology, Philosophy, and Social Issues

Whittling down the pacifist narrative: Did early Christians serve in the army?

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Is it true that Christianity was a pacifist movement for the first few centuries of its existence?

“Most serious scholars of church history today agree that for the first three centuries of the Christian church, Christians rejected not only emperor-worship and idolatry but also participation in the military.”

This quote was taken from a fairly unknown website. I picked it just because it reflects a confidence that a lot of Christians I have spoken to appear to have: The confidence that everyone who knows about this knows that the first few centuries of church history reveals that Christians were pacifists, and that got messed up later when theologians like Augustine compromised the teachings of Jesus with the worldly ways of violence.

Pacifism, Matthew 5 and “Turning the other cheek”

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Long story short: “Turning the other cheek” does not mean becoming a pacifist. But some of you may require more persuasion than that, so keep reading.

On the 27th of October 2012 I enjoyed taking part in a panel discussion for Elephant TV on Christian views on war. Dr Chris Marshall (a former lecturer of mine) and Adrian Leason spoke on behalf of the Christian pacifist view, and Rev. Captain Paul Stanaway and I represented a just war perspective. Elephant TV is a fairly unique forum in New Zealand, bringing together Christians from different perspectives on contentious issues in front of an audience and cameras, getting a summary of their side of the story and putting questions to them to discuss. I think the event – and the series as a whole – is a fantastic idea to give exposure within the Christian community to the “elephant in the room” (where the show gets its title), those issues that we know are there and are important, but aren’t necessarily being discussed in churches in a way where all sides get a fair hearing.

The hope of all of this of course is not just that people will hear somebody say something they like and make up their mind on the spot, but that they will gain a new perspective to help them think more about these things for themselves. We were only able to scratch the surface of some of the issues mentioned, and as I said to people after the recording – there’s so much that we’d all no doubt like to have added, responded to, explained further, but that’s what blogs are for! Being stimulated to focus again on the issues of pacifism, the use of force and the role of Scripture in the discussion has meant that my thoughts have been occupied by some of the biblical material that frequently becomes part of the arsenal (pun intended) of Christian pacifists. Over the next little while I’ll be discussing some of that biblical material.

The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife: Update

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

The evidence now suggests that the “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” is almost certainly a fake.

Not long ago I offered some thoughts on the alleged discovery of a previously unknown Gospel, referring to Jesus’ wife. It is a very brief fragment, but it bears similarities to already known Gnostic writing. Even if it was everything that Dr Karen King claimed it to be, it would still only have been a work from the fourth century that was arguably first written in the late second century, at a time when plenty of far-fetched gnostic writings were being produced. Not exactly earth shattering. However, quite a number of scholars at the time had serious doubts that this fragment was even as interesting as that, suspecting that it was nothing more than a much later forgery, written to look like an earlier gnostic work but in fact simply plagiarising the Gospel of Thomas.

Those suspicions have now been resoundingly confirmed: the fragment is almost certainly a fake. I say “almost certainly” because of course it’s nigh-on impossible sometimes to prove such things with 100% certainty, but we now have about as much certainty as anyone could hope for. Not only does the alleged Gospel fragment strongly resemble the Gospel of Thomas in terms of language and content (however brief), but it contains an unusual typo – the very same typo that an online version of the Gospel of Thomas contained.  For more detail, see the analysis over at Mark Goodacre’s NT Blog.

Suggest a link!

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Got a good link to share? Have a look at my links page and see what’s there: Other blogs on theology, philosophy, biblical studies and related subjects. There’s also a section for organisations or websites that aren’t blogs, but which are still focused on these subject areas. There’s also a section for blogs that aren’t necessarily directly about academic theology or philosophy, but which are still intelligent blogs in some way connected to the themes explored at this site. These might include things as diverse as music, mental health, spirituality, education, physical wellbeing or art, and I would expect blogs in this category to look at these issues from a broadly (orthodox) Christian point of view – the more academic blogs need not always do this.

If there’s a link that you think fits well on the list, this is the place to suggest it! (You can also do this any time by contacting me.) The kind of blogs that I’m looking for need to be well-written, they should be designed to promote irenic discussion (angry rants have their place in the world to be sure, but I’m not looking for blogs that are full of them) , and they will ideally not be too partisan (for example, if it’s a Christian blog I prefer that the owners do not demand on pain of heresy that contributors adhere to the catechism of the Catholic Church, or all of the Westminster Standards – I’m an ecumenical kind of guy, and if it’s an atheist blog, make it a respectable one – citations of Richard Carrier or “Acharya S” will not help their cause). I do make the occasional exception for the sake of fairness, including blogs that I both disagree with and which I think are somewhat partisan, but are interesting nonetheless. I’ll leave it up to you to guess which ones they are!

Let’s have your suggestions! I make no promises to include anything, but if you don’t ask, you never know. 🙂

Moral Horror

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Are morally assessable actions the same just if they have the same evil outcome? I don’t think so. I think this misses at least one important aspect of moral thinking, one that I call moral horror.

No, you really did not build that

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Political conservatives (among whom many would count me) have been lining up to shoot down Barack Obama’s statement on businesses when he said to entrepreneurs, “you didn’t build that.” They’re wrong when it comes to replying to Obama (because they misconstrue him), and I think that if they actually held to the view that Obama was replying to, they’d be wrong more generally when it comes to claiming the credit for our achievements too.

Changing the scenery

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Time for a change of scene! Over the next little while I’ll be experimenting with a few different looks for the blog.

Keep calm and carry on.

Yes, the media does deliberately misrepresent and demonise creationists

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

If by “creationism” we all mean the belief that evolution is false (and probably a lie from Satan) and that the Universe is almost certainly less than ten thousand years old, then I’m not a creationist. I do not have the dire issues with evolution that creationism has, and I think that creationists tend to have a wildly false understanding of the history of the universe.

But the enemy of my enemy is not my friend. The way the secular media here in New Zealand has treated creationists recently is unspeakably dishonest and wrong. 

The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife?

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Suddenly, everyone is linking to news articles about an allegedly shocking new discovery that turns our view of the historic Jesus on its head. The caption under the photo at Stuff reads: “A previously unknown scrap of ancient papyrus written in ancient Egyptian Coptic opens the debate about whether Jesus was married.”

Well actually, no it doesn’t. No new debate is opened, no important new evidence has been discovered. Business is really continuing as usual. But in the view of some, the new discovery will be of much interest, as it contains the words, “Jesus said to them, ‘my wife.”

The trap of the self-referential question

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Trent Dougherty put this photo on Facebook. Have a look at it and then try to answer the question.

What you may find is that as soon as you starting coming up with answers, they move. What are the chances of randomly picking the correct answer to this question? Well, there are four options, so the odds are one in four, or twenty-five percent, right? But wait a minute, two of the options say twenty-five percent. And if that’s the right answer… then that would mean half the options are correct, so now your chances of picking the right one are fifty percent. No, wait, that can’t be right, because fifty percent appears once among the options, and your chances of randomly picking it are twenty-five percent, which would mean that fifty percent is wrong. Well, are twenty-five percent and fifty percent both somehow right? No, that can’t be right, because that would make three of the four options correct and your odds would be seventy-five percent. And seventy-five percent isn’t an option.

At this point you might start thinking “wait, how did I get so tangled up? How come each time I choose an answer it looks like the facts change? This must be a trick!”

Page 22 of 78

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén