The blog of Dr Glenn Andrew Peoples on Theology, Philosophy, and Social Issues

Search results: "moral argument" Page 11 of 12

Wolterstorff and Peoples on Rawls – It has a nice ring to it, no?

I’m not the kind of guy who tends to be fazed when people – even people for whom I hold a good deal of respect as insightful thinkers – do not agree with me. However, I’m also someone who likes to see people that I respect as insightful thinkers expressing the same conclusion as me. […]

Public Lectures

Dr Glenn Peoples on Abortion, Morality and Law Canterbury student group Prolife UC have organised for Dr Glenn Peoples to deliver some free public lectures at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch on Abortion, Morality and Law. Thursday 30th July 7.30 pm “Chasing the Justificatory Goalpost: Public Justification and Religious Beliefs” There is a broad […]

(dis)honest to God: How Not to Argue about the Smacking Referendum

Ian Harris tells us (“Honest to God,” Dominion Post, [Dominion Post. Saturday July 11, 2009. Page B5], reproduced at the YesVote website) that we should reject the “harsh views” on child rearing found in the Bible. Mr Harris, unfortunately, joins many of those who promote the criminalisation of good parents by muddying the waters. He […]

The Provocation Defence Needs to Remain

Although provocation is never an excuse for violence, the courts must acknowledge that it exists.

Skeptics and the annoyance of the little things…. like facts.

Over the last few years I’ve noticed a pattern. I’ve seen plenty of skeptics present arguments against Christianity or certain aspects of Christianity like its moral code, its metaphysical beliefs and so forth. What I’ve noticed is that when a spokesperson presents an argument (say, against the “horrible” God of the Old Testament) and the […]

Norman Geisler on Annihilationism

Does Norman Geisler’s view of hell make God into an abusive father?

John Loftus on the Ten Commandments

Out of concern that a Christian apologist was not responding fairly or charitably to him, John Loftus recently brought to my attention his comments about a man who prominently placed the ten commandments on his property, a move that some in his community called “courageous.” John’s comments are HERE. Loftus doesn’t think there’s anything courageous […]

John Sanders and the problem of suffering

I’ve been reading the book by Christopher Hall and John Sanders, Does God have a Future? The Debate on Divine Providence. (http://www.amazon.com/Does-God-Have-Future-Providence/dp/0801026040). It’s a debate between an open theist (Sanders) and a classical theist (Hall). Open Theism is, in part, the view that God does not know about all the events that will happen in […]

(one of the ways in which) Van Til was wrong

Every now and then I tip my hat in the direction of Cornelius Van Til – But he was wrong in a few ways, and I’d hate for anyone to think that I’m one of those dyed-in-the-wool Van Til fans who think he could do no wrong. He did much wrong (and much good), philosophically […]

Divine Commands and Reasons

From something I was writing today (well, not word for word, but the idea is the same). One version of a divine command theory of ethics is the causal version, where God’s will or command causes acts to be right or wrong. One objection to this is that this makes morality arbitrary, since God has […]

Page 11 of 12

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén