The blog of Dr Glenn Andrew Peoples on Theology, Philosophy, and Social Issues

Search results: "moral argument" Page 9 of 12

Jesus Week 2011

This week I’m in Auckland taking part in a couple of speaking events as part of Jesus Week at the University of Auckland. On Wednesday the 4th of August I really enjoyed taking part in a panel discussion with Matt and Madeleine Flannagan, called “A Godless Public Square”? The broad subject area was the legitimate […]

An open letter to my traditionalist friends

Dear friends Not just friends, but brothers and sisters. Some of you might think that I am feigning my treatment of you as both friends and even family. I’m not sure how to persuade you that I’m genuine, but I am. I’m writing this open letter because I don’t know you all personally (in fact […]

Episode 041: The Epistemological Objection to Divine Command Ethics

If morality comes from God’s commands, does that mean that unbelievers don’t know the different between right and wrong?

Richard Carrier on the Resurrection part 1

At his Internet Infidels website and in a number of talks including a debate with Michael Licona on the Resurrection of Jesus, Richard Carrier presents an argument for “Why I Don’t Believe the Resurrection Story.” I have decided to put together a response to the reasons that Carrier offers for not believing in the resurrection […]

Inspired by actual events

Hi Glenn! Sitting here at my keyboard, in isolation from the rest of the world, I have come up with the ultimate argument against all religious belief – especially Christian belief. I have not consulted history to see if anyone has addressed this question before. I have not read any contemporary literature on the subject […]

In Defence of William Lane Craig on Original Sin

Apologists need to calm down and stop eating their own. I will admit to jumping on a bandwagon with this one. A good recent post over at MandM alerted me to just how far and wide the phenomenon of apparently ignorant evangelicals bashing William Lane Craig is spreading based on something he said recently. Since […]

Does self sacrifice make a greater difference in godless universe?

I recently finished reading Erik Wielenberg’s book Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe. I’ve already commented a couple of times on crucial junctures in that book where the author’s argument against theologically grounded ethics depends heavily on conceptual confusion and misrepresentation. It would get a bit tedious to write a blog entry every time […]

God and the Meaning of Life

In my lunch breaks I’m reading through Erik Weilenberg’s book Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe. In an earlier post, “Do Moral Facts Not Require an Explanation?” I commented on Wielenberg’s claims about moral facts not requiring any explanation. When I first got the book, I first turned to the second section, which addresses […]

Calling published scholars

If you are a scholar who has authored a book in philosophy or theology, published by a reputable publishing house, then I want to hear from you if you’re interested in what follows. In the humanities (maybe in other fields too, but who cares), one of the best ways to have a book published is […]

Debate Review: Flannagan V Bradley

“Is God the Source of Morality?” Is it rational to ground right and wrong in commands issued by God? Matthew Flannagan (left, affirmative) vs Raymond Bradley (right, negative) University of Auckland, 2nd of August 2010 Few subjects in philosophy are more interesting to me than the meta-ethical question of what makes any moral claims true. […]

Page 9 of 12

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén